Most workflow automation tools make you draw the process on a canvas first. Zero asks you to describe it, then writes both the workflow and the trigger that runs it.
You never write it yourself. Ask Zero to do the job once and it proposes the steps, the tools, and the result. You correct it, and that agreed version becomes the workflow.
Every Monday, put the client report together and post it in #clients.
Here is how I would run it — tell me what to change.
Saved, it becomes a reusable skill under your organization — anyone can run it, and every later fix lands for the whole team at once.
Run every Monday morning and produce one report per active client.
StepsBind it to a schedule, a new email, a calendar event, or a finished run and it starts itself. One workflow can sit behind several triggers.
No canvas, no node graph, no expression language. You describe the process, review what Zero wrote, and decide when it runs.
Say what needs to happen and let it propose the approach. You correct what it got wrong before anything is saved.
It becomes a reusable skill in your organization. Anyone can run it, and every fix lands for the whole team.
Attach a schedule, a new email, a calendar event, or a finished run. It starts itself and reports back.
Every run leaves a log of what it read and did. When the output drifts, you edit the workflow in language, not configuration.
Recurring processes that never justified an engineer or a seat of workflow management software, and that business process automation tools are too rigid to take.
The Monday metrics, the weekly pipeline review, the monthly board update — delivered before anyone asks.
Track competitors or a market on a fixed interval and keep one running document, not a new tab every morning.
The week's calendar, threads, and open items in one brief, so Monday starts with a page instead of a search.

Check a dashboard or a query on a schedule and speak up only when a number leaves the range you set.
Watch a mailbox, summarize what matters, and prepare the reply as a draft. Sending stays your decision.
When something does cross the line, the alert arrives with the history and the likely cause, not just the number.

Draft, illustrate, and format the recurring piece, then hand the last edit to whoever owns the voice.
Move what was decided into the CRM, the tracker, or the spreadsheet — same fields, same way, every time.
Turn the week's work into the status doc, the changelog, or the client update, written from what happened.

Around 290 connectors, so one workflow can read from one system and write to another without anyone building an integration.
Slack, Gmail, Notion, GitHub, HubSpot, Salesforce, Stripe and the rest — some connect by approving OAuth, others with a key you paste in. Either way it is held outside the environment the agent runs in and attached at the network boundary, so the workflow never carries it.
Approve the exact scopes a workflow needs, for the people who need them, with an expiry. Read stays separate from write.
Scraping, search, maps, weather, and market data are built in and called without an account of your own.
A workflow is the instructions on their own: reusable, shareable, no schedule. An automation is that workflow bound to a trigger and an agent, so it runs without anyone opening a chat.
No. Ask Zero to do the job once, let it propose how, and correct what it got wrong. The version you save is the one you agreed on.
No. Describe the job in a sentence and Zero writes the workflow. There is no canvas, no node editor, and no expression language.
A schedule, a new message in a connected mailbox, a new calendar event, or another run finishing. You can also start one by hand.
The person who owns it. It reaches a connected service only where that person granted access, and only for the permissions they approved.
The run stops and keeps its log, so you can see which step broke and what it was working with. Nothing is retried silently.
Most workflow software is a builder: lay the process on a canvas, wire the branches, map every field. Zero is described rather than built, so it also copes with steps a rigid platform cannot, like reading a thread and judging what matters.
Both. An assistant answers when you ask; a workflow automation platform runs the same process on a schedule. Zero saves what the assistant got right and hands it to an AI agent for workflow automation on a trigger.
Yes. AI process automation pays off on processes that span systems: one workflow reads from several tools, produces the artifact, and posts the result. What AI business process automation will not do is replace a system of record.
No. Anyone who can brief a colleague can write a workflow — the difference between this and process automation that ships with an implementation project.
Zero also covers generative services, team collaboration, and Slack. See the built-in web services, the models you can switch between, and pricing.
Describe the work once. Zero writes the workflow, and you decide when it runs.